It’s fair to say, as I make my way through Stansted Airport towards the metal detectors and glorified bouncers patrolling them, that I really don’t want to be searched.
I’ve never enjoyed being touched up by the (usually) male attendant who is (always) the size of a brick shithouse. And, without wanting to go into too much detail, I’ve developed a nasty bit of food poisoning involving waterfalls at both ends, so I don’t relish being poked and prodded too much either.
Fortunately, my bag doesn’t set off any alarms and as I self-consciously shuffle through the security system – it’s the only way – I’m relieved by the lack of immediate excitement that follows. I suppose I have no reason to expect otherwise: after all, I’ve removed metallic objects from my pockets and even taken off my belt, which, had I not held up my jeans with my hands, could have led to a disastrous trousers-falling-down situation that could only be interpreted as a come-on to the burly man about to frisk me. But they don’t, and I cross the threshold unscathed.
Then, without warning, the security man has his hands all over me. Bloody hell, I think, he’d be thrown out of Solus for less than this.
I am being searched for dangerous weapons even though the machine designed to find them has come up with nothing. I am under suspicion for absolutely no reason at all.
How annoying. How embarrassing. How utterly predictable.
Ever since I grew my first beard in the sixth form (and was asked by a bloke in Dukes nightclub, “Oi mate, is you Muslim?”), I have been looked at in a very different light, usually through sideways glances. The hirsute look seems to make people uneasy, as if I can be trusted no more with my life than I can with a razor. Going through London with a backpack, the reaction reaches hysteria levels – people look fearful and some actually move away from me.
And though this is my first flight bearded, I know exactly what to expect. Agitation from other passengers; suspicion from the authorities. It continues through the airport: my passport is studied much longer than anyone else’s, stewards start fidgeting when I reach into my pockets and on the whole I get so much unwanted attention that as I take my shoes off for the added security check, I feel like scaring a few people by saying, “Ah, it’s just like in my Mosque.”
Because in the two years I have had this, my second beard, I have been told three things on a regular basis:
i) I look like a tramp.
ii) I look like a Muslim.
iii) I look like a terrorist.
And, ignoring i) for a moment, it’s what people see as a natural connection between ii) and iii) that concerns me. I find it deeply saddening that so many people find it a logical step from ‘Muslim’ to ‘terrorist’.
You can see this on the street every day: “His jacket looks dodgy”; “Oi mate, ‘Allah Akbar!’”; and, towards Muslim women wearing burkhas, an appalling ‘Middle East’ accent and the words, “Does my bomb look big in this?” These examples aren’t taken from a small demographic; this fear, ignorance and casual racism is everywhere.
And, mysteriously, it seems to incorporate those of us who grow hair on our faces. I find myself on the receiving end of the same jokes (well, not the one about the burkha), and the same scrutiny, and the same mistrust. And I’m not the only one: I met a lovely bearded chap by the name of Ben who said the looks he gets, especially when carrying a camping bag big enough to hold a bomb, have made him totally paranoid. As he put it, “As someone who sees himself as a nice, friendly person, it is terrifying to see people being terrified of me.”
In his BBC programme ‘Travels with my Beard’, Rajesh Thind, a British Asian, explained his decision to grow a beard after a few days’ growth caused him to be searched on the Tube under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act. His ‘investigation’ of sorts uncovered a fearful, intolerant London, with people giving him a wide berth, even letting him have whole Tube carriages to himself (the one upside, I imagine). Upon being stopped and searched by police for the fourth time (something he’d never experienced clean-shaven), he asked if it was the beard that put him under suspicion. “Just face it – you look dodgy,” came the reply.
However, that was in the weeks following the July 7th bombings in London. Though in no way excusable, trepidation around anyone Asian and bearded was, perhaps, to be expected. But as time has passed, the culture of fear has quietened somewhat; isn’t it time the culture of ignorance and intolerance passed too?
The Australian ex-cricketer and commentator Dean Jones was sacked last year for calling South African cricketer Hashim Amla “the terrorist”. That’s some inspiring commentary. Amla, a devout Muslim, has a fantastic beard slightly reminiscent of W. G. Grace’s – though Grace, self-obsessed, whinging wanker that he was, was never accused of wanting to bring the West to its knees, which is effectively what Jones suggested about Amla.
It’s the fact Jones called him “the terrorist”, not “a terrorist”, that worries me, as though Amla’s faith and facial hair require him to be designated a role; a nickname, even. As a Muslim playing for South Africa, he’s clearly in the minority. But that doesn’t mean he should be singled out, and especially not in this fashion.
And, to return to selfish reasons, I don’t see why I should be either. The mistrust with which I am treated actually involves a double whammy of stupid assumptions: that because I have a beard I am a Muslim, and that because I am a Muslim I am a terrorist. Make of that what you will. I would love to think people don’t link the two apparent resemblances in any way, but I know for a fact that is naïve – as naïve as the people who think that because I don’t shave, I am potentially dangerous. Strangely, I’ve never been accused of looking like a Christian terrorist.
Clearly the beard isn’t doing me any favours – apparently I also resemble Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper – but I think I’ll keep it for now. While it keeps narrow-minded airline passengers in a state of sheer panic, it’s worth it.

1. chris white
“apparently I also resemble Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper”
My uncle was interviewed by the rozzers in that case.
They interviewed virtually everyone that had both a beard and a Wearside accent.
So next time a bomb goes off, expect a knock at the door…
2. Tiffany Corrine Dow
Tell your “moderate” or anti-violence Muslim friends to speak a little louder about how Muhammad didn’t kill people and didn’t teach intolerance and maybe, even with your beard, you will be trusted more. It’s the natural reaction to have when Muslims a continent away sing a very different song about the Prophet. And, in the Hadiths are many many stories of Muslim brutality. So, you’ve chosen a different path, but many in your religion have not. Christians would call that “taking up the cross”. People of faith are called to endure the persecution of the world. Accept no one can point at Jesus and say he was violent or taught violence. In Islam, that distinction isn’t as clear. If you’re way is the true way…prove it and make it clear. Then, you can grow whatever you want and not worry about it.
3. Rasputin
...sorry, what’s your point? Genuinely confused.
4. Tiffany Corrine Dow
I do research on Islam. What I have found is that there are justifications in the Hadith (compilations of stories about the actions and words of Muhammad) and Qur’an (the words of Muhammad, thought to be the word of God) for violence, strict punishment, inequality, etc. These things are evident in the life of Muhammad for anyone open to the same historical-critical analysis that the Bible has gone through. The issue gets messy because most Western Muslims (I am unaware of any groups in the Muslim world) will argue the peace, tolerance, etc., of the Qur’an and ignore the evidence that says otherwise. I was calling the author to prove to the West that his way is the correct way, the real Islam, and then we’d trust Islam (and him) regardless of his beard (a sign of devout passion). My second point in the comment was that it is the call of any believer to weather the sufferings of persecution. It’s part of the faith to be ridiculed and stigmatized. I may not get labeled a terrorist, but I know a lot of people who think I’m a quack because I believe in Jesus Christ. I’ve lost friends and been outright abused for my beliefs, but I take it happily.
Hope that clarifies.
5. chris
I had a beard once and it was realy itchy- more itchy than a doughnut down your pants actually
6. Rasputin
“I was calling the author to prove to the West that his way is the correct way, the real Islam, and then we’d trust Islam (and him) regardless of his beard (a sign of devout passion).”
Would it help if I said I’m not a Muslim?
7. Mark
Just a chap with a dodgy beard…....
8. Tiffany Corrine Dow
Sure. Then my comments would be misdirected, but the point still stands. I was in a conversation last night with three Muslims—one Shia and two Sunni Muslims. They admitted that killing homosexuals, adulterers and apostates was OK in a last resort. They couldn’t define “last resort”. They said that Salman Rushdie should have a fatwa on him, that Ayaan Hirsi Ali should be threatened with her life and the van Gogh should have been killed for the movie he produced with Ayaan. If Muslims want trust across the board, these types of beliefs won’t help. And, if you are a Muslim and you don’t believe these things, defend your faith and show us why they are wrong.
9. Mark
It doesn’t matter what they, you, me or anyone else believes Tiffany, everybody is entitled to an opinion, and, whilst you might disagree with them, why do you care? As long as they obey the law they can think what they like and if they don’t and if it goes before a court and they are found guilty for any crime then they should be treated accordingly.
10. Tiffany Corrine Dow
You obviously haven’t read what goes on in certain Muslim communities in the UK with women and children. You are also neglecting to acknowledge the people who have been killed by Muslims in the West for writing or speaking about Islam and Muhammad. You ignore the writers and public figures who have 24-hour guards and live in hiding after receiving threats on their lives. I won’t give Islam an ounce of trust until I am convinced that all of this is truly a distortion of the faith—in my research of the faith I have found justifications for these things. I don’t hate Muslims and each Muslim I have met has gotten a fair shot with me on all matters not including faith. Rights are being infringed on—rights I care about. Rights and values that the left are letting Islam trample. If any Muslim is going to talk about the prejudice he or she faces, they should also explain why that prejudice is wrong.
11. Mark
I prefer to give the benefit of the doubt. I will presume that any Muslim I come across is a decent, law abiding citizen. If it turns out that they are not then I hope the law treats them accordingly. Just what more do you want?
12. Jon
I thought it was supposed to be innocent until proved guilty?
13. chris
Mark, I am not accusing you of double standards- its just that you regularly accuse Palestinians, even Palestinina children shot by the IDF, of being terrorists. Just wondering how you square this with your statementabout giving ppl the benefit of the doubt?
14. Mark
No, I don’t, I said that some Palestinians are terrorists and commit terrorists acts. Besides, given the situation, if you’re a Palestinian kid who is pissed at Israel then you shouldn’t go round pissing off IDF soldiers as they’re of the creed that one should shoot first and ask questions later, given the lessons learnt of suicide bombers.
Besides what Israel does is her concern, my statement was directed at people living in Britain.
15. chris
No its not Israel’s concern alone becasue of something called International law, human rights etc. And before you start, I support Israel’s right to exist but not her right to engage in terrorism and kill (unarmed) children.
16. Tiffany Corrine Dow
I’d have to say I agree with Chris. Israel has a right to statehood. To add to this, the better question is why EVERY Muslim I’ve ever spoken to disagrees and Israel, which is surrounded by Muslim countries, has had to be vigilant since the second it got statehood. If you look at the history of Israel you will see that it wasn’t always on the defensive. It spent years getting attacked and threatened before it developed the “fuck you first” attitude to Arab states. I think we should also look into the texts of the Muslims for answers to why the Jews are hated. Muhammad wasn’t good to Jews and accused them of fabricating the scriptures—which is why Muhammad felt it necessary to retell and alter all the prophets and Biblical stories he used in the Qur’an. Yet, Muslims believe that these stories are the literal, perfect and unchanged word of Allah. Muslims are indoctrinated to think less of the Jews. Because of this, and international law and human rights, I’m down with getting involved.
17. Jon
I find it amusing that people here are declaring that they support Israel’s “right to exist.” When did it happen that we became so up ourselves that we would reject a people’s right to have their own state, particularly with the Jews in Israel after they were being systematically annihilated by Europeans?! It disgusts me to think that we would even consider rejecting such a notion.
What disgusts me even more though is how people cannot look at other people as being human beings, rather than seeing a religion. Why does it matter if you are Christian, Muslim, Jewish? We are all people. Let’s look after each other rather than kill each other. Or is that too idealistic and we’re all so f*cked up that it will never happen? Thanks religion for bringing such happiness and harmony to the world.
18. Tiffany Corrine Dow
It’s hard to protect people who want to annihilate you or overrun your government to impose others laws on your nations.
19. Jon
Why do they want to annihilate you though? Mostly because of religion. If people forgot about that then they probably wouldn’t have an intrinsic desire to blow people up etc, at least in the Middle East anyway.
20. Tiffany Corrine Dow
Yea, we could all be atheists and the world would be perfect.
21. Jon
Did I say it would be perfect? No.
But then again, you yourself wouldn’t view every Muslim with distrust and they wouldn’t have to explain themselves to you to get even a smidgen of acceptance, Islamic extremists wouldn’t want to kill Westerners on a jihad, and people wouldn’t be judged as much for being homosexuals etc etc.
Surely, if only those 3 things happened the world would be a better place already.
P.S. If there was no religion there wouldn’t be an idea of gods, so there would be no atheists because there wouldn’t be anything to reject. So, poor attempt at trying to infer that everyone would be a “lost soul” by calling everyone atheist as if there is something wrong with it.
22. Tiffany Corrine Dow
I didn’t say that atheists are lost souls. I won’t deny that I think it’s a rebellious stance to take, but I’m not going to damn you all to hell.
You fail to mention that without religion most charities wouldn’t exist and the West would not have the position it has in the world. Religion—a belief in God–propelled our ancestors forward, sometimes that took a negative shape. There are a lot of just and loving people in the world who have transformed it for the better based on a belief in God.
23. Tiffany Corrine Dow
I didn’t say that atheists are lost souls. I won’t deny that I think it’s a rebellious stance to take, but I’m not going to damn you all to hell.
You fail to mention that without religion most charities wouldn’t exist and the West would not have the position it has in the world. Religion—a belief in God–propelled our ancestors forward, sometimes that took a negative shape. There are a lot of just and loving people in the world who have transformed it for the better based on a belief in God.
Serious question: does the Atheist society have an outreach and donations wing on campus?
24. Jon
Very grateful for you not damning everyone to hell.
The West might not have its position of being hated/distrusted by the East, no.
You fail to recognise all of the charities that are not religious who do the same things as religious charities in supporting people.
I think it was more of a belief in wanting to better ourselves and our desire to explore that propelled us forward. And there are a lot of people in the world who have transformed it for the better not based on a belief in a god. I suppose it is arguable that we might actually be more advanced than we are now if religion didn’t exist because the church wouldn’t have spent centuries trying to hold back scientific advancement and understanding in case it went against religious teaching.
I know you will never concede even to the possibility that religion is a bad thing, so this really is a bit of pointless argument we are having here.
25. Tiffany Corrine Dow
I can certainly concede that a very many horrible things have been done in the name of religion, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to reject religion altogether. That’d be quite Bipolar.
If you can back up your argument that wanting to better ourselves and explore the world just appeared in us, I’ll continue this conversation. I have heard very in-depth lectures about the early writers and philosophers in the church who have proven these things and many other things came from their belief in God. This was the origination of a belief in the dignity of man and of equality, the beginning of the development of music, etc.
You didn’t answer my question either…
26. Jon
“If you can back up your argument that wanting to better ourselves and explore the world just appeared in us, I’ll continue this conversation.”
That’s completely unprovable and you know it. Can you prove without any doubt that they are because of God? No. So it somewhat stupid to reason like that to try and win a debate.
“I have heard very in-depth lectures about the early writers and philosophers in the church who have proven these things and many other things came from their belief in God.”
Of course they did. They were in the church so obviously they came from their belief in God. Do you ever actually look at secular things, or do you only ever look at theological works?
“This was the origination of a belief in the dignity of man and of equality, the beginning of the development of music, etc.”
Can you actually prove that? I think this is just conjecture, there is no proof for it. Musically I can imagine that religious chants helped to develop the music movement, but I doubt that you can prove that music came from a belief God.
“You didn’t answer my question either…”
No, there isn’t as far as I’m aware. Is that supposed to be some sort of damning point?
27. Tiffany Corrine Dow
As neither of us can prove anything, as you’ve kindly pointed out, I think this thread has now become a waste of time.
Enjoy your evening.