The recent leaking of the British National Party membership list has brought up some surprising facts about the average member. Far from perpetuating the stereotype of being the party of tattooed white skinheads, the list has shown members include amongst others teachers, academics and even ministers of religion. So why are so many different people becoming attracted to the far-right politics of the BNP?
Last week the Secretary of State for Communities, Hazel Blears, spoke out, claiming that white working class voters turn to the BNP because they feel ignored by mainstream political parties.
Hazel Blears suggested that for many people politics is often a “closed world” far removed from their everyday existence, and that politicians need to be addressing the “bread and butter” issues which really matter to typical voters. She recognises that where the BNP wins votes it is often a result of local political failure in places where estates are often ignored for decades and votes are taken for granted, leading people to look elsewhere for answers.
In the current political climate, with the ongoing problems of the economy, the health service, the fight against terror and attitudes towards immigration, increased dissatisfaction with the government and political parties in general is clear. Many people feel that there is simply nobody in the mainstream parties representing their interests. This as a result has been clearly illustrated by increasing voter apathy. The feeling that the mainstream parties are failing the population is reflected in the presence of former Liberal Democrat, Labour and Conservative party members on the leaked list. Whilst the mainstream parties are doing little to address the growing grievances of ordinary voters, the British National Party is taking the opportunity to exploit genuine concerns in order to gain increased popular support.
Under Nick Griffin’s leadership the BNP have made an effort to distance itself from its overtly racist past in an attempt to make the party more acceptable to a wider range of people, including those who would not consider themselves as racist. By focusing campaigning on areas with racial tensions the BNP has been able to develop support in a small number of specific areas such as Leicester and East London, and now has 56 local councillors across Britain. Numerous journalistic investigations have revealed extensive racism of members of the BNP, but this is something which is kept firmly behind closed doors. Outwardly the party tries to present itself as the alternative to the three ‘old-gang’ parties, providing answers when the other parties do not. The BNP has seized upon the lack of clarity of the main opposition parties’ position on the Lisbon Treaty, styling itself as the only party which cares about British sovereignty. On its website the BNP claims to be the only party willing to address concerns over multiculturalism, immigration, the EU and crime and punishment. The party has even begun to target schoolchildren with their ‘Racism cuts both ways campaign’, citing the importance of targeting young people due to their lack of “loyalties to the old parties.”
What is abundantly clear is that the BNP are manipulating often legitimate concerns of voters in order to gain popular support. The BNP plays on people’s fears and convinces people that only they can guarantee the security of British citizens through, in the words of Hazel Blears, “peddling pernicious but plausible lies.” What has to be constantly brought to attention is that even seemingly reasonable aims of the BNP have racist undertones. Politicians of all parties should take notice of Blears’ comments, as all parties need to win back the trust and confidence of disaffected voters and to prove that mainstream politics has the answers they seek.

1. Helena Carter
None of the “fears” the article refers to are erroneus. The country’s face is changing and the demands from pressure groups representing hostile immigrants grow ever bolder. New Labour and Conservative Lite are interchangeable and offer no real solutions as both depend heavily on immigration to maintain their power. There is no “Right Wing” party to vote for as Cameron is obsessed with not rocking the leaky lifeboat Brittania. The BNP don’t seem so Far Right anymore do they, in the absence of Opposition from Her Majesty’s Opposition? May you live in interesting times.
2. Anthony Heath
The BNP are gaining support because they are acting in a different way from Labour/Lib/Con. They are addressing issues that the mainstream parties are reluctant to address through fear of upsetting ethnic minorities or the left-of-centre chattering classes. The BNP are also doing lots of work at grass roots level and where they are active they are clearly more active that any of the other parties. Essential, the BNP policies (end mass immigration, leave the EU) strike a chord with very many British people. All the mainstream parties stand for the same thing.
3. Immigrant :O
Helena -
” Groups representing hostile immigrants grow ever bolder ” ?
Right..the Polish Separatist Faction protests all the time and don’t get me started on the Indian Brown Wolves.
” Offer no real solutions as they both depend on immigration to maintain their power “
Then they really screwed-up with the British Jobs for the British and Are you thinking what we’re thinking ? campaigns. Moreover, do ” real solutions ” automatically mean putting a wall around Britain or something ?
Anthony -
Mainstream parties, meaning the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal-Democrats have very different positions if you bother to read their proposals. Economic views, social views, views on immigration and the EU – they all differ substantially. But since all you’re interested in is blaming immigration for everything you put them all in the same pot.
Daniella -
Is there any point in mentioning that economic studies showed immigration having a positive effect on the UK economy or that it was EU funds that went to the London bank bail-out ? All that the BNP is doing is populism of the worst kind by exploiting xenophobia – they are not interested in “genuine issues” like the UK’s poor policy on energy supply or NHS funding because solving them would be politically-unwise. Instead, they use emotional issues such as immigration to create the illusion that everything is great in the UK but the immigrants ruin it.
4. Anthony Heath
Response to the post by “Immigrant”
The mainstream parties have slightly different positions on some issue. In essence they have all been in favour of mass immigration and they all think Britain shouldn remain in the EU.
As for the economic benefit of mass immigration. I suggest you look at the reports produced by the House of Lords and the London School of Economics. They both conclude that mass immigration has very little positive economic impact.
5. Immigrant
There might not be some great ideological rift between the parties but the devil is in the details.
e.g. Brown’s decision not to pressure France for a milder position on Turkey’s potential joining of the EU means that Turkey has less to gain from resisting opposition from Russia towards the Nabucco pipeline project and thus raising the odds that Gazprom will still be able to advance it’s interest in Europe for the foreseeable future which also limits the UK’s energy options while North Sea oil production is falling and nuclear plants are being decommissioned.
thus, that simple decision may prove much more important than all the circus around immigration.
May I please have the name and/or links towards the LSE reports saying that ?
In the end, it’s your country and thus your decision. If you want to deport immigrants and leave the EU, you’re free to do it. But don’t try to sell the bull that immigrants are hurting the UK or that the British are somehow the chosen people. Christ’s sake, you lost the biggest empire the world has ever seen because of xenophobic arrogance, didn’t you learn anything from that ? From the country of the Magna Carta and Habeas Corpus, I expected better.
6. Hosehead
The “BNP are manipulating often legitimate concerns of voters”, while the mainstream parties “addres” these concerns with “responsible engagement”! I guess that until we get rid of the lib/lab/con cabal we’ll simply have to put up with this newspeak.
7. Daniella
In response to “Immigrant”- I am not arguing that immigration is a negative thing or suggesting empathy with the BNP’s stance on this issue- I have not mentioned the possible positive impact of immigration because this is not an article discussing the pros and cons of immigration, it is an article exploring why different groups of people are attracted to the BNP. I agree with you that the BNP exploits emotional issues to gain popular support- this is the general point of my article.
In response to “hosehead”- I don’t understand what you are actually quoting- i don’t actually use the phrase “responsible engagement” in my article. Any sentiments to this effect are reflecting the comments of Hazel Blears, which are going to have a certain tone because 1) she is a politician and 2) she outlined these views in an article in The Guardian newspaper.
I make no claims that this article is anything more than a general view of why a small minority of people have turned to the BNP. It is not a comprehensive look at the reasons why people have become disillusioned with the political mainstream, the policies and workings of the BNP, or the issues surrounding immigration. If this article has provoked debate about some of those issues then that can only be seen as a good thing.
8. Anthony Heath
Daniella,
People, from all backgrounds, are supporting the BNP because they agree with what the BNP stand for. It really as simple as that.
Same reason for supporting any party.